Ice hockey is a sport that’s famous for its fast-paced and physical nature. But one rule that has puzzled many fans and even players is the icing rule. For those who are new to the sport, the icing rule can be confusing and sometimes frustrating. But why do they wave off icing in hockey? Let’s dive in and explore this rule in-depth.
Firstly, it’s essential to understand what icing means. Icing occurs when a player shoots the puck from behind the center red line over the opposing team’s goal line, and the puck isn’t touched by anyone before crossing the line. This rule exists to prevent players from clearing the puck to relieve defensive pressure and slowing down the game. Why was this rule introduced? And how has it evolved over the years?
Understanding the icing rule can impact how you watch and enjoy the game. It’s crucial to know how icing can affect the flow and outcome of the game. Keep reading to discover what happens when a team commits icing, and how this can lead to penalties, face-offs, and strategic plays.
If you’re a fan of ice hockey, it’s essential to understand the icing rule fully. The rule can make or break a team’s strategy, and knowing the ins and outs of the icing rule can give you an edge in predicting the game’s outcome. So let’s get started and explore the different aspects of the icing rule in hockey!
Table of Contents
Icing rule in hockey explained
For those who are new to hockey, the icing rule can be quite confusing. Simply put, icing is when a player shoots the puck from behind the center red line over the opposing team’s goal line without it being touched by anyone else.
When this happens, the referee blows their whistle, and play is stopped. But why is this rule in place? The icing rule is designed to prevent teams from gaining an unfair advantage by simply shooting the puck down the ice to relieve pressure.
The team that commits the icing infraction is not allowed to make a line change, which can put them at a disadvantage if they are tired or have the wrong players on the ice. Meanwhile, the opposing team gets a free pass out of their defensive zone and an opportunity to mount an attack.
However, there are some exceptions to the icing rule. For instance, if a team is shorthanded, they are allowed to ice the puck without being penalized. Additionally, if the goalie leaves their crease to play the puck, icing is waved off.
Understanding the icing rule in hockey
As mentioned earlier, icing is a rule in hockey that is meant to prevent teams from gaining an unfair advantage by simply shooting the puck down the ice without any intention of making a play. But what exactly is icing in hockey? It occurs when a player shoots the puck across the center line and past the opposing team’s goal line, without it being touched by another player.
When icing occurs, the play is stopped, and the faceoff takes place in the defending team’s zone. However, there are a few exceptions to the icing rule in hockey. One exception is when the team that shoots the puck down the ice is short-handed, meaning they have one or more players in the penalty box. Another exception is when the puck is shot down the ice by a defending player from behind their own team’s center line.
It’s important to note that there are also different types of icing, including touch icing and no-touch icing. Touch icing occurs when a player from the opposing team touches the puck first after it crosses the goal line, resulting in a stoppage of play. No-touch icing occurs when the puck crosses the goal line without being touched, and the play is stopped automatically.
The icing rule in hockey is in place to prevent teams from simply shooting the puck down the ice to gain an advantage, but it’s important to understand the exceptions and different types of icing that exist in the game.
How icing can affect the game
Delay of game: When a team commits an icing violation, play is stopped, and the ensuing faceoff takes place in the offending team’s defensive zone. This can give the opposing team a crucial opportunity to set up a play and apply pressure on the defense, potentially leading to a goal.
Physical toll: The race to touch the puck before it crosses the goal line can be intense, and players often collide with the boards or each other at high speeds. This can result in injuries, and players need to be aware of their surroundings to avoid getting hurt.
Strategy: Teams can use icing strategically, especially when they are trying to defend a lead. By icing the puck, they can take a breather, change players, and get organized, potentially disrupting the other team’s momentum.
Momentum swings: A successful penalty kill after an icing violation can swing the momentum of the game in the offending team’s favor. Conversely, failing to capitalize on a power play after an icing violation can swing the momentum in the other team’s favor.
Potential injuries from chasing an icing call
When a team is called for icing, the players on the opposing team have the opportunity to touch the puck first, thus negating the icing. This often results in a race for the puck, with both teams’ players skating at high speeds toward the end boards.
This chase can lead to dangerous collisions, as players are often focused on the puck rather than each other. Injuries can occur from crashing into the boards, colliding with other players, or even getting hit by the puck.
Players have suffered a range of injuries from icing-related collisions, including concussions, broken bones, and spinal cord injuries. These injuries can have long-term effects on a player’s health and career.
While icing is a necessary rule in hockey, the potential for injury during an icing call is something that players and coaches must always keep in mind.
The impact of icing on momentum and team strategy
Momentum: When a team commits an icing infraction, it can disrupt their momentum and give the opposing team an advantage. The offending team is not allowed to change their players, which means they may have tired players on the ice.
Strategy: Teams can use icing to their advantage by intentionally committing the infraction to get a much-needed break. This is known as “icing the puck” and can allow the team to regroup and get fresh players on the ice.
Offensive zone faceoffs: When the offending team commits an icing infraction, the ensuing faceoff takes place in their defensive zone. However, if the defending team touches the puck first, the faceoff moves to their offensive zone. This can be a strategic advantage for the defending team.
Goalie strategy: In certain situations, goalies may choose to leave their net during an icing infraction to retrieve the puck and prevent the opposing team from getting an offensive advantage. However, this can be a risky move as it can leave the net vulnerable to a quick shot.
How icing affects player fatigue and performance
Fatigue: When a team commits icing, players on that team are not allowed to change lines. As a result, the players who were on the ice during the icing call are forced to remain on the ice, leading to fatigue. Fatigued players can make mistakes, miss shots, and become less effective in their positions, which can impact the outcome of the game.
Muscle strain: Chasing an icing call can lead to muscle strain in players. Sprinting at full speed to beat opponents to the puck can cause players to overexert themselves, leading to potential injuries. The strain on their muscles and the additional physical effort can negatively affect their performance during the remainder of the game.
Mental strain: The mental strain of constantly chasing the puck can also impact a player’s performance. The added pressure of trying to catch the puck before it crosses the red line can lead to mistakes and lapses in judgment, which can result in goals for the opposing team. Players who constantly chase the puck may become demoralized and lose focus, impacting their ability to perform well on the ice.
What happens when a team commits icing?
When a team commits an icing infraction, the play is stopped, and the puck is brought back to their defensive zone for a faceoff. The team that committed the icing violation is not allowed to change their players for the faceoff, while the opposing team can change their players as they wish.
Committing an icing infraction can result in significant disadvantages for the team, especially if they are already tired or in a difficult game situation. The team is forced to defend their zone again, potentially leading to further fatigue and giving the opposing team more opportunities to score.
In some cases, committing an icing infraction can also lead to penalties if players try to prevent the opposing team from touching the puck. This is known as delay of game and can result in a two-minute penalty.
Overall, icing is a critical rule in hockey that affects the flow of the game, player fatigue, and team strategy. Teams must be aware of the potential consequences of committing an icing infraction and work to minimize their use of the rule.
Faceoff location: When icing is called, the play is stopped and the faceoff occurs in the defending zone of the team that committed the icing. This gives the attacking team an advantage, as they have an opportunity to set up their offensive play and potentially score a goal.
Defending team strategy: The defending team can use this opportunity to strategize their defense and prepare for the faceoff. They may decide to switch out their players to put their best faceoff and defensive players on the ice, or they may try to anticipate the opposing team’s play and adjust their formation accordingly.
Importance of winning the faceoff: Winning the faceoff after an icing call is crucial for the defending team. It allows them to gain possession of the puck and clear it out of their zone, preventing the attacking team from setting up their play and potentially scoring a goal.
Repetitive icing calls: If a team commits multiple icing infractions in a short period, the officials may assess a delay of game penalty. This penalty can result in a power play for the opposing team, putting the penalized team at a further disadvantage.
The opportunity for the opposing team to change lines
When an icing call is made, the defending team is not allowed to change lines, while the opposing team has the opportunity to change lines. This can be a significant advantage for the opposing team, as they can ensure that their top players are on the ice to take advantage of the situation.
It’s not uncommon for coaches to use icing as a strategic tool to get a favorable matchup on the ice. By quickly changing lines after an icing call, the opposing team can put their best players out against the tired players on the ice for the defending team.
On the other hand, if the opposing team doesn’t take advantage of the opportunity to change lines, the defending team may be able to recover and gain some momentum by keeping the same players on the ice.
Overall, the opportunity for the opposing team to change lines after an icing call can have a significant impact on the outcome of the game, and coaches must be strategic in how they use this advantage.
Controversial icing calls in hockey history
The “no-touch” icing rule debate: One of the most controversial icing calls in hockey history is the “no-touch” icing rule debate. The debate centered around whether to eliminate the touch-up icing or not, where the offensive player touches the puck first to negate the icing call.
The 1972 Summit Series: In the 1972 Summit Series between Canada and the Soviet Union, there was a controversial icing call that disallowed a Soviet goal. The call resulted in a faceoff in the Canadian end, which Canada won, and went on to score the winning goal.
The 1996 Western Conference Final: In the 1996 Western Conference Final between the Detroit Red Wings and the Colorado Avalanche, there was a controversial icing call that led to a collision between Avalanche player Peter Forsberg and Red Wings player Igor Larionov. The incident led to a heated exchange between the two teams.
The 2012 Stanley Cup Final: In the 2012 Stanley Cup Final between the New Jersey Devils and the Los Angeles Kings, there was a controversial icing call that led to a goal by the Kings. The call was controversial because it was unclear whether the puck had crossed the goal line before the icing call was made.
The 2019 World Junior Championship: In the 2019 World Junior Championship game between the United States and Finland, there was a controversial icing call that led to a game-winning goal by Finland. The call was controversial because it was unclear whether the puck had actually crossed the goal line before the icing call was made.
The infamous “no-touch” icing rule
The “no-touch” icing rule, which was implemented in the NHL in 2005-06, allows for the linesman to blow the play dead as soon as the puck crosses the goal line, without requiring a player from the opposing team to touch it.
This rule was put in place to reduce the risk of injury from players colliding at high speeds while racing for the puck to negate an icing call.
Some argue that this rule has made the game slower, as it eliminates the exciting race for the puck that often occurred on an icing call.
However, others believe that the no-touch icing rule has improved the game, as it has reduced the number of icing-related injuries and allowed for a quicker resumption of play.
Overall, the no-touch icing rule remains a controversial topic in hockey, with strong arguments on both sides.
The 2004 Stanley Cup Finals icing call that changed the series
The 2004 Stanley Cup Finals between the Tampa Bay Lightning and the Calgary Flames was a hard-fought series that came down to a pivotal moment in Game With the score tied 2-2 in the third period, Lightning forward Martin St. Louis raced down the ice to negate an icing call by Flames defenseman Andrew Ference.
The call was controversial, as replays showed that St. Louis may have touched the puck before crossing the red line. The resulting faceoff in the Flames’ zone led to a Lightning goal by Brad Richards, which proved to be the game-winner and forced a Game
The Flames were outraged by the call and felt it should have been waived off. Flames captain Jarome Iginla stated that “it’s a tough way to lose” and that the team was “frustrated and disappointed”.
The Lightning went on to win Game 7 and the Stanley Cup, with Richards being named the Conn Smythe Trophy winner as the playoffs’ most valuable player. The icing call remains one of the most controversial in NHL history and had a significant impact on the outcome of the series.
The NHL has since implemented the “hybrid” icing rule, which allows for a linesman to determine whether a defending player will reach the puck before an attacking player, eliminating the need for players to race down the ice and potentially risking injury.
The controversial game-deciding icing call in the 2019 IIHF World Championships
During the 2019 IIHF World Championships semifinal game between Canada and Finland, a controversial icing call was made that resulted in the game-deciding goal for Finland.
The play in question involved Canadian defenseman Dante Fabbro racing to touch the puck before it crossed the goal line for an icing call. However, the linesman deemed that Fabbro did not touch the puck before it crossed the line and waved off the icing call.
The Finnish team quickly retrieved the puck and scored the game-winning goal, resulting in a 3-1 victory and eliminating Canada from the tournament.
The call was met with much controversy, with some arguing that Fabbro did in fact touch the puck before it crossed the line, while others argued that the linesman made the correct call based on the angle and speed of the play.
Regardless of one’s opinion on the call, it remains a contentious topic in the hockey world and serves as a reminder of how one split-second decision by a linesman can drastically impact the outcome of a game and tournament.
The future of the icing rule in hockey
Evolution: The icing rule has evolved over time, from the original “no-touch” rule to the hybrid version currently in use. There is potential for further changes to the rule to improve player safety and game flow.
Technology: With the implementation of video review and advanced analytics in hockey, there may be opportunities to use technology to help officials make more accurate icing calls.
International Differences: The icing rule varies across different international hockey leagues, leading to confusion for players and fans. There may be a push for standardization of the rule across all leagues in the future.
Player Input: As with any rule change in hockey, player input is crucial. There may be a need for more discussion and feedback from players to determine the future direction of the icing rule.
Potential changes to the current icing rule
Hybrid icing: One proposed change to the icing rule is the adoption of “hybrid icing,” which would involve a linesman making a judgment call at the faceoff dot to determine whether a defending player or an attacking player would reach the puck first.
Automatic icing: Another proposed change is “automatic icing,” where play is stopped and the puck is faced off in the defensive zone if the puck crosses the icing line, regardless of whether a defending player reaches it first.
Allowing offensive team to play puck: Some suggest allowing the offensive team to play the puck if it crosses the icing line before the defending team, similar to how the puck is played on a delayed penalty call.
International rule: Another option is to adopt the international rule, where icing is waved off if the puck is shot from behind the center line and goes past the goal line without being touched by the defending team.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the purpose of the icing rule in hockey?
The icing rule in hockey is designed to prevent teams from continuously clearing the puck down the ice in an attempt to relieve pressure from their defensive zone. The rule requires the puck to be played by an opponent before crossing the goal line, otherwise, play is stopped and a faceoff is held in the offending team’s defensive zone.
How is the icing call made in a game of hockey?
The icing call is made by the linesman, who must determine if the puck has crossed the goal line and if it was last touched by a player from the opposing team. If the linesman determines that the puck was shot down the ice without being touched by an opponent and it crosses the goal line, the icing call is made.
What happens after an icing call is made?
After an icing call is made, play is stopped and a faceoff is held in the offending team’s defensive zone. The team that committed the icing violation is not allowed to make a line change, while the opposing team can freely make substitutions to take advantage of the offensive zone faceoff.